Could More Data Lead to Identifying More People Who Should Be Offered Suicide Awareness Training?Pin

Could More Data Lead to Identifying More People Who Should Be Offered Suicide Awareness Training?

That seems to be what they found in Oregon. And according to this article it’s something that more local agencies are trying to identify as well.

In Oregon, what they found when they started looking into the rise in the rates of suicide, was that they didn’t really have any more information than that. So Kimberly Repp spent a year just following along on death investigations, trying to get as much information as she could about the people who dies by suicide in the county at that time. What she wound up gathering was a really good look at something that often gets overlooked, because no one is collecting the data. She found some of what these people were doing on the last day, or days, of their life, and identified people who might be able to notice what is happening, and do something about it.

The data they found wouldn’t necessarily translate to other areas, but I think what they found is interesting in terms of thinking about how many people, common, everyday people, going about their daily jobs, might be able to make a difference if they’ve been trained to notice and respond to someone who may be having suicidal thoughts. Not just therapists, social workers, or doctors either.

“We were able to identify touchpoints in our community that we had not seen before,” Repp said.

For example, data revealed a surprising number of suicides at hotels and motels. It also showed a number of those who killed themselves had experienced eviction or foreclosure or had a medical visit within weeks or days of their death. It revealed that people in crisis regularly turn their pets over to the animal shelter.

So they started offering training to a whole different group of people:

The training is typically offered to people like counselors, educators or pastors. But with the new data, the county realized they were missing people who may have been the last to see the decedents alive. They began offering the training to motel clerks and housekeepers, animal shelter workers, pain clinic staffers and more.

This is why, when I had the opportunity to take a basic suicide prevention course earlier this year I did. Because you just never know where these touchpoints may come. Most locations don’t have the kind of data they’ve gathered up in Washington County Oregon. We don’t know what kinds of things people in crisis will spend their time doing. Maybe it’s getting one last nice meal, or making sure their pets are taken care of, or traveling somewhere else. Regardless, we should do a lot more work like this to try and identify those things, but we also just need to have more people aware, alert, and able to respond to someone in crisis. That’s what will get the rates starting to go down, doing the things that we know save lives.

And the more people capable of shepherding someone through that crisis and diverted to help like the 1- (800) 273 – TALK Lifeline, the more lives we can potentially save.

Isn’t that worth spending some time in training?

Similar Posts

  • Stamp out Hunger

    Don’t forget, tomorrow is Stamp-out Hunger day here in the US. If you leave out non-perishable food items, the local letter carrier in more than 10,000 cities and towns will collect them for your local food banks. Read the link for more info.

  • Trauma Upon Trauma – Reading about Lauren Book’s Experience with Stolen Images

    As you might imagine these sorts of activities are severely traumatizing, and Lauren’s response in the article I linked makes that clear. I also want to address the more subtle trauma here though. That trauma comes from those of you who will read this story and immediately respond “well she shouldn’t have been taking those photos”.

    I want to be very clear here. That statement is 100% blaming the victim. This is the same exact thing as saying a woman shouldn’t have walked alone at night, or had a drink, or a child shouldn’t have been so friendly with strangers, etc. Lauren didn’t do anything wrong. What she and her husband do inside of their marriage is none of our business, no laws were broken, nothing untoward was going on. She was just a wife living her life and she was hacked. The person who stole these photos was the one breaking the law. The people sharing and selling those photos were breaking the law. Save your moral outrage for them and the people requesting to have these photos used to create fake rape videos because she was a rape victim.

    Anyone who can read the entire story and walk away indignant more at her for having taken photos that were perfectly legal and a personal choice instead of the people who have violated her are simply violating her again.

  • |

    We get mail

    Actually I got an email from Andy, with a couple of links:   I thought I’d pass on these observations I’ve found for you to consider, ponder and maybe even comment on. The first is from Alice Miller, and comes from her website: http://www.alice-miller.com/flyers_en.php?page=3 (the 12 points) The second is from a search of wikipedia…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
Write a response on your own website and include a link to this post. Then submit your response’s URL here. Your response may appear here after moderation. To update or remove it, edit or delete your original post and submit the same URL again. Learn more about Webmentions.