Another loss

I was having a discussion with my wife tonight about giving blood and all the eligibility requirements that the Red Cross has added to keep the blood supply disease-free when we realized, that I can’t give blood. I hadn’t ever realized that before. I’ve not been a regular donater of blood by any stretch, because I have extremely difficult to locate veins and drawing blood is quite the adventure when it’s necessary, it never really seemed worth the effort when it wasn’t necessary.

You see the Red Cross eligibility guidelines are very strict when it comes to HIV risk.

You should not give blood if you have AIDS or have ever had a positive HIV test, or if you have done something that puts you at risk for becoming infected with HIV.

You are at risk for getting infected if you:

(Among a list of risk-factors)

are a male who has had sexual contact with another male, even once, since 1977

I was molested by aother male as a child and into my teens. Well after 1977.

I’m not going to get into a debate over whether they’re correct or not. I’m not in the medical field, I trust them to know better and to err on the side of caution, so I understand why they have these guidelines. I’m just left feeling more of a loss. After all these years of work, and all the progress I’ve made dealing with the issues surrounding my abuse, I found something else that was stolen from me.

I don’t know that I can put this into words so that you’ll understand why this makes me sad. I just somehow feel victimized, again. Even though I had no plans to donate blood, having the choice to do it taken away hurts.

Similar Posts

  • How Twitter Proved to me the Survivor Community Is Still Learning

    Recently, I linked to an article whose headline referenced a rape epidemic: Link – There’s a Rape Epidemic in America That No One Is Talking About https://t.co/KWJSR0PaQ7 — Child Abuse Survivor (@SurvivorNetwork) June 14, 2016   The article in question referred to male victims of rape, boys raped as children, and males raped as adults…

  • Anniversaries

    When Marj mentioned on Twitter today that this month marks the four year anniversary of the Blog Carnival Against Child Abuse, it got me thinking about the importance of anniversaries. As a survivor, or anyone who is concerned about healing or improving in any way, anniversaries, birthdays, holidays, etc. are a good opportunity to take…

  • Migraines and Depression

    According to this Psychology Today article people who regularly get migraines are more likely to suffer from major depression than people who don’t. I suffered from major depression for a long time and have had migraines for as long as I can remember. But I don’t think the migraines caused the depression, the child abuse…

  • Giving

    I told you a while back that I was going to be looking for a new place to give all the money I’ve raised, what little there is, plus some of my own. It wasn’t that I didn’t like the Prevent Child Abuse America organization, it was more that I felt like I gave to…

  • The importance of unlearning our childhood stories

    I could not heal until I unlearned that my abuse was something I somehow caused. Unlearning that opened up the possibility of learning something different, namely, that I was abused because someone decided to abuse me. Did that happen overnight? Of course not! Unlearning is a process, and the more closely we identify with a belief, the more difficult it becomes to unlearn it. So many survivors learn at a very early age to keep secrets, that bad things will happen if they tell anyone.

    People who’ve never had that belief drilled into their young minds wonder why victims wait decades to come forward and tell their stories. That’s why! That belief is hard to unlearn. Many of us grew up with silence being the thing that prevents the abuse from being worse. Why should we start discussing it? If you tried to tell someone as a child and got shut down, this only gets worse. 

3 Comments

  1. Actually that’s not the way I read it, it seems to say that if you are at risk, which by their definition I am, you shouldn’t give blood. I could simply lie about it, knowing that I’ve been tested and tested and I am HIV-, but the way it makes me feel to look at the definitions wouldn’t change, even if I did give blood!

  2. Mike – I understand your pain, honest I do.

    But at the same time, while you have that unwanted experience in your past – you should also know that the rule states that you are at RISK of having HIV if…it doesn’t state that you can’t be tested and tested and tested and you CAN give blood every year and they test it for HIV before they even use it. IF it has HIV + then you will be notified and the blood will be disposed of and not used…believe me, I know – I went through it, and I am HIV free…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)