Link – Judge was unaware he gave joint custody to father accused of raping the then-12-year-old mother

I’m sure many of you saw the original story over the past few days, and now that the judge has come out and clarified what happened, I hope we can put the brakes on the tar and feathers campaign, at least for the judge.

But, we may want to hang on to the tar and feathers for a system that seems to have so many “automatic” rules that no one even bothered to stop and figure out what was going on.

As I understand it, the mother tried to enroll in the state aid program for her child. That automatically triggered the state to find the father and sue for back child support, because the state always wants to try and find a father to help support a child instead of doing it themselves. That seems like a fairly laudable idea, but it is an automatic event. The mother has no say in it.

Then, when they found the “father”, he actually agreed to pay child support. (Maybe he felt guilty about what happened, maybe he figured it wasn’t worth fighting). This triggered the default action at hearing where the judge, having heard no reason not to, awarded partial custody or some sort of visitation for the father who was living up to his support obligations.

Again, this is all pretty automatic in family courts. To the point that, no one even asked if he wanted custody, and he hadn’t actually expressed any desire for it.

No, the problem here wasn’t the judge, it was a system that was on auto-pilot so much, that no-one bothered to read a file or talk to either party. I fail to see how that can be good for the child. Do you?

Again, I’m not against the default behaviors here. Mothers trying to get financial aid for their kids should also be helped to get support from fathers too instead of just getting it all from the state. Fathers wiling to meet their responsibilities should be afforded a chance to see their kids. But somewhere along the way, someone needs to figure out what has happened, and whether the default action is actually the best action. Sometimes, clearly, it isn’t.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/judge_was_unaware_he_had_given_joint_custody_to_father_accused_of_raping_th

Similar Posts

  • Sharing – Sexual abuse: Why young males are often invisible victims

    I grew up in a world where having my friends and other parents think I was gay seemed worse than just continuing to be abused. Think about that for a minute. Think about what we tell boys about being a man and how society reacts to men who share that they were sexually abused as a child? Is there anything about it that screams “Tell your story. We support you!”.

    There are some small pockets of that online and in certain circles, but it’s going to also come with a lot of questions about why you didn’t fight, how you’re destined to now be an abuser, that you enjoyed it, etc.

    Female victims of almost all ages will get asked about what they were wearing, how much they drank, etc. That’s wrong.

    Male victims will get our own set of questions, mostly about why we didn’t fight, why we were so weak, are we gay? That’s equally as wrong.

  • Sharing – Pay attention to the chameleon kids

    ake describes the risk of these kids growing up to be people pleasers. I’d go one further. Not only did I grow up as a people pleaser, but I also had zero sense of self. Without someone to react to and to become the person they wanted me to be, I was no one. I tell people this often but I spent more time in therapy figuring out who I am than I spent trying to process childhood trauma and that was a direct result of growing up as this chameleon kid. My entire personality was based on fitting what was needed by other people, starting with my alcoholic father and the person who sexually abused me, right through to friends and my first wife. I was what I thought they wanted me to be. When my therapist started asking about what I wanted to be, I was blank. There was nothing there.

  • Link – The Brain Under (Sexual) Attack

    This is about sexual assault, but it’s the same kind of thing we see with child abuse survivors too: Can’t we just believe survivors, or at least conduct really good investigations, without knowing about the neurobiology of stress and trauma? In theory, maybe, but often the ways people report reacting to assaults can be baffling,…

  • Link – Can we use big data to fight child abuse? The answer is complicated

    I will be interested in this trend – “Analyzing historical data to forecast an event is called predictive analytics, and it’s already being used in some industries; credit card companies, for instance, use predictive analytic tools to detect fraud. In the case of child and family services, these tools could be used to process historical…

  • Sharing – The Lesser-Known Effects of Childhood Sexual Abuse

    The last thing I want you to consider as you read the article below is that some of these effects are contradictory. For example, sexual abuse can cause hyper-arousal and sex addiction, while also causing survivors to not want to be touched. Two different survivors, despite suffering from similar abuse, may have opposite reactions to that abuse, while others may have some combination of both of the contradictory effects. (For example, that same person who is hyper-aroused may also cringe at certain kinds of sexual touch.) 

    The point is that this list of possible effects is helpful. It will help you understand some of what is going on with your partner. It’s not a replacement for open conversation about the effects that individual is dealing with.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)